Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Job von Witzleben

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move: Job von Witzleben (Prussia) → Job von Witzleben

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. No opposition after two weeks. Jenks24 (talk) 11:51, 11 July 2012 (UTC)Reply



– The DAB in question has only two entries. This proposal would make the subject, a minister who reformed the Prussian army in the early 19th century, primary topic, per WP:TWODABS. To the extent that Job von Witzleben (historian) is notable at all, it is as the nephew of anti-Hitler conspirator Erwin von Witzleben. Googling "Job von Witzleben" -wikipedia brings up mostly results related to the Prussian minister, nothing about the "historian". See also Talk:Job_von_Witzleben_(historian)#Requested_move. Relisted. Favonian (talk) 11:07, 1 July 2012 (UTC). Kauffner (talk) 16:11, 24 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Survey

[edit]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Note, the above RM follows on from a RM at

Closed as: The result of the move request was: not moved. There don't seem to be overwhelmingly compelling arguments or consensus here that either subject is the primary topic for the term. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 04:33, 19 June 2012 (UTC) No note of this RM there, or that RM here. Not a biggy, but not best practice either. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:24, 9 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Portrait?

[edit]


A portrait would be nice. -- 70.49.127.65 (talk) 04:00, 2 July 2012 (UTC)Reply