Talk:Jetset Magazine
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contested deletion
[edit]This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --184.190.8.200 (talk) 17:32, 28 September 2016 (UTC) it is an accurate wikipedia page for a reputable business.
Contested deletion
[edit]This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --184.190.8.200 (talk) 17:34, 28 September 2016 (UTC) all information on this business is accurate.
Contested deletion
[edit]This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Kelmoo (talk) 17:35, 28 September 2016 (UTC) This page follows the exact same format as many other pages regarding highly read magazines for example:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankie_(magazine)
or
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet-Set_(magazine) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_(magazine) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Sailing_magazine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bird_Talk
Why are the above on Wikipedia? Jetset magazine is niche and has a wide readership, in fact more than Frankie magazine it appears. There are many very notable editors and is worthy of entry into Wikipedia.
Contested deletion
[edit]This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Kelmoo (talk) 10:43, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Why is this page up for deletion? It has a wide readership and is necessary I feel in order for readers to not be confused with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet-Set_(magazine)
Is this page is not worthy then why are these pages up? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankie_(magazine) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bird_Talk https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet-Set_(magazine)
Please can you reply thanks. Kelmoo (talk) 10:43, 30 September 2016 (UTC)