Talk:Iowa Highway 150/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 02:53, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

DABs and ELs are good. (The link checker is choking on some links, but manual checks confirm that they are ok.)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   I found a word missing and added it. Everything else looked good.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All good here

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   All good here

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   All good here

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All good there.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   With the single fix, I found nothing that stuck out as an issue in need of correction to list this article, ergo, it's being promoted to GA status. Imzadi 1979 → 04:49, 30 April 2012 (UTC)