Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Invisible hand

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 months ago by Andrew Lancaster in topic misuse

misuse

[edit]
Alternatively, it can be misused or misinterpreted as a conspiracy to use a hidden mechanism to control markets or society, or as an existing conspiracy that a powerful "invisible hand" exists.

Any objection to removing the part after the comma, or at least the last phrase? —Tamfang (talk) 01:12, 26 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Not from me. I suppose whoever wrote this believed that a conspiracy was only a plan, and is not necessarily the best word to use for a plan which was already in effect? Do we even need to have the word conspiracy here, rather than just referring to a hidden control mechanism?--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 05:22, 26 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Dear @Lancaster and @Tamfang , how can it be a: "hidden control mechanism" if the "invisible hand" is usually misquoted and misattributed in a pseudo-scientific context, in order to justify ignorance and laissez faire as faith into free markets and globalization ? Dark Flow (talk) 09:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
You seem to be asking: given that for Smith and his followers the i.h. is a metaphor ("as if by an i.h."), how can other people possibly use the same term for a sinister cabal? —Tamfang (talk) 18:53, 28 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
I find this all hard to follow. If we want to say that the invisible hand is sometimes used as an excuse for bad things, then I think there is a lot to be said, and there are sources. Are there other ideas being proposed?--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 18:57, 28 October 2025 (UTC)Reply