Talk:Inverse Laplace transform
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The content of Post's inversion formula was merged into Inverse Laplace transform on 9 May 2020. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Significance?
[edit]It would be cool if articles like this had a sentence or two explaining overall significance or use. I even have some math background and still don't know (or remember :-) ) why this is article-worthy. What about people who hit this by "random page"? BTW, who is Bromwich? Stan —Preceding undated comment added 23:30, 13 June 2003 (UTC).
Dutch article
[edit]Hmm, I don't know Dutch, but the Dutch article is a lot m|ore informative. Maybe a Dutch speaker would like to volunteer to translate? Phys —Preceding undated comment added 20:20, 13 August 2003 (UTC).
Lacking in Content
[edit]It's unfortunate that such a commonly used operation doesn't have a good Wikipedia entry. I'll start working on this page and hopefully add a section describing the inverse transform and the Bromwich integral in a clearer and more useful way. I'll also try to add a section on convolutions and the theta function too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gmcastil (talk • contribs) 23:07, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Merger proposal
[edit]I propose to merge Post's inversion formula into Inverse Laplace transform. The former article is just one of the multiple ways to invert a Laplace transform and since it is not so big, I think that it should be moved entirely to this article. Saung Tadashi (talk) 05:40, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Merge completed Klbrain (talk) 18:25, 9 May 2020 (UTC)