Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Invariant subspace

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 years ago by 160.39.248.110

Hello,

I have a question related to the article on invariant subspaces. So, Let V and U be subspaces of W such that W is the orthogonal sum of U and V. Let T be a linear mapping such that T: V -> V and T: U -> U. Accordingly, we can say that V and U are both invariant subspaces of T (or that U and V are T-invariant subspaces). What about if I have a mapping S: V -> U and S: U -> V. Is there a technical name for this? I would appreciate if you can point out some literature on the subject.

Tank you very much.

193.136.189.2 (talk) 11:00, 9 April 2009 (UTC)MRReply

in the case S, in addition to S: V -> U and S: U -> V, satisfies S^2 = I, it looks like you have something similar to a Z_2 grading on W. Mct mht (talk) 22:35, 9 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your reply Mct. No, it does not happen in my case. I would say, if I was allowed, that U and V are "S-cross" and T-invariant subspaces with respect to W (or something like that) but I would be sloppy. My point is that T-invariance is important and has a name that we can employ and everyone will know what it is. Unfortunately, "S-cross" is also important for me but I search and don't find a name for it, that is why I am being "sloppy" and call it, by now, "S-cross" invariance with respect to W. Thanks for your time. 85.247.86.194 (talk)MR

Just a curiosity: V and U will be invariant subspaces of S^2 right? MAC 160.39.248.110 (talk) 01:54, 20 May 2014 (UTC)Reply