Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Writing, a WikiProject interested in improving Wikipedia's coverage of content related to the fields of rhetoric, composition, technical communication, literacy, and language studies.WritingWikipedia:WikiProject WritingTemplate:WikiProject WritingWriting
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Both by its content, and by etymology, "Prolegomenon" and "Prolegomena" should probably redirect to Prologue, not Introduction. Prolegomena establish the fundamental terms of a scientific paper or treatise, but they do not serve the purpose of an introduction, as detailed in this article. This is why Kant can write his Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics; they are not an introduction in stating the origin and purpose of metaphysical research (which in any case would not be his own), but instead serve to establish the fundamental terms of what "any future metaphysics" can be about. --Don Ecchi (talk) 12:54, 30 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
