Talk:Interstate 376/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough4872 01:58, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   The lead of the article is too long, it should be an adequate summary of the route. The history is a mess, with poor section organization and bulleted lists.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   There are several statements and whole sections that are unreferenced. In addition "www.pahighways.com" is not a reliable source.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   The route description lacks detail for a route of its length

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Currently, the article has several issues before it can be considered for GA. Therefore, I will have to fail it. The article may be renominated once the issues are addressed. Dough4872 01:58, 16 March 2011 (UTC)