Talk:Integrated Performance Primitives

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Integrated Performance Primitives article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computer graphics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

C/C++ Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject C/C++, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of C and C++ topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.C/C++Wikipedia:WikiProject C/C++Template:WikiProject C/C++C/C++
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article falls within the scope of C.
	This article falls within the scope of C++.

"multi-threadedness" of IPP

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Intel IPP developers have deprecated, in the latest versions (i.e. 8.0 forward), multi-threaded computation within an IPP function. The latest documentation and release notes make clear that it is up to the application developer to multi-thread his/her own code, and not depend on IPP calls to be multi-threaded underneath the application utilizing IPP. Perhaps this adjective ("multi-threaded") should be removed from the first sentence in the article. Open to hearing other thoughts on this.

Thanks, Jeff Jbarnesfrar (talk) 15:26, 23 May 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbarnesfrar (talk • contribs) 13:58, 15 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Jbarnesfrar (talk) 15:23, 23 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

"multi-threadedness" of IPP