Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Innichen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Andy M. Wang in topic Requested move 13 August 2016

Requested move 13 August 2016

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Let the user who attempted a copy-paste know that there wasn't consensus. (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 06:34, 21 August 2016 (UTC)Reply


InnichenSan Candido – The English name has changed to San Candido, see here:http://www.three-peaks.info/en/san-candido.html Sro23 (talk) 12:56, 13 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose. The current article title Innichen is perfectly in line with our policies, namely WP:NBZ: [...] articles about locations in South Tyrol are placed according to the language of the linguistic majority. In any case, the ngram viewer suggests a clear prevalence of Innichen in English books, too... --Mai-Sachme (talk) 20:27, 13 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. User:Mai-Sachme's ngrams shows an increase in usage of Innichen in English print sources. Also note the titles of other South Tyrolean places. —  AjaxSmack  21:02, 13 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment I don't think were allowed to withdraw requested moves, but I just want to say I agree with what everyone opposing has been saying, they make good points. To be honest, the main reason why I requested a move is a user tried to do a cut-and-paste, which I undid, but then they asked me nicely to move the articles, and I felt bad. Sro23 (talk) 16:13, 16 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.