Talk:Infodumping

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Neurology / Psychiatry

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Neurology task force.
	Psychiatry portal This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force.

Disability

Infodumping is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability

Autism

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Is this article's tone or style not acceptable?

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

@49ersBelongInSanFrancisco: Why does the article have these cleanup tags? Jarble (talk) 14:25, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

An issue I immediately see is usage of things like calling it "important [to the person infodumping]" without that language in the source. Or calling it an "issue". These are not neutral presentations. The "Engaging with infodumping" is particularly bad with it's presentation. Moreover, there is not a single high quality source here, and those being used are all low and questionable quality. The template regarding it being written like a guide is likely targeted at the sort of wording used in the "Engaging with infodumping" section. The article does have multiple issues and does need work. Kimen8 (talk) 15:19, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Exactly. I think there's a plausible article about "infodumping" but this version suffers from the problems described above. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:23, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Feedback from New Page Review process

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good start. Infodump is a very generic widely used term. This is an article about infodumping with respect to autistic/neurodivergent people. This article really needs a more specific title. I would have renamed except I think it can better be done by and editor with more expertise/sources in this area. Happy editing!

North8000 (talk) 17:40, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Is this article's tone or style not acceptable?

Feedback from New Page Review process