Talk:Indinavir
Add topic | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Indinavir.
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Yjjong. Peer reviewers: Limur34, Alignad123, Joarfr.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Moved from article
[edit]I have moved the following content here because it lacks context/explanation. If anyone wants to use it to improve the article, here it is. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:55, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
- [[File:Indinavir synthesis.png|thumb|center|700px|Indinavir synthesis:<ref>{{Cite journal | doi = 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)75787-X| title = Highly diastereoselective reaction of a chiral, non-racemic amide enolate with (S)-glycidyl tosylate. Synthesis of the orally active HIV-1 protease inhibitor L-735,524| journal = Tetrahedron Letters| volume = 35| issue = 5| pages = 673| year = 1994| last1 = Askin | first1 = D. | last2 = Eng | first2 = K. K. | last3 = Rossen | first3 = K. | last4 = Purick | first4 = R. M. | last5 = Wells | first5 = K. M. | last6 = Volante | first6 = R. P. | last7 = Reider | first7 = P. J. }}</ref>]]
Stereochemistry in structure incorrect?
[edit]The alpha benzyl group has the incorrect stereochemistry drawn. The centre alpha to the amide is drawn as S while the structure is defined as R in the name. Not sure how to edit these structures but the dashed bond should be bolded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.47.4 (talk) 11:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
History / Controversy
[edit]Apart from textual and grammar errors it would be good to reorganize or even split the article in factual description and the controversies that surround a specific introduction. It would make the article easier to understand 83.97.80.89 (talk) 17:28, 27 January 2020 (UTC)