Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Indigenous rights

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by PurpleChez in topic Canada

Doctrine of Discovery and Indigenous Sovereignty

[edit]

This page needs to have some commentary on the Doctrine of Discovery also Indigenous Sovereignty redirect to this page. Indigenous Sovereignty and Indigenous Rights are two distinct concepts.

From a Maori perspective see Mana Motuhake

Nga Mihi  Preceding unsigned comment added by Hemopereki (talkcontribs) 21:40, 12 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


Indigenous Criticism of Indigenous Rights

[edit]

Indigenous academics namely Aileen Moreton-Robinson and Hemopereki Simon are critical of the system of indigenous rights in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. Moreton-Robinson writes in relation to the UNDRIP.[1] Simon writes in relation to the lack of recognition of Mana Motuhake by the Aotearoa New Zealand state.[2]  Preceding unsigned comment added by Hemopereki (talkcontribs) 22:15, 12 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. Moreton-Robinson, Aileen (2011) Virtuous racial states: The possessive logic of patriarchal white sovereignty and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Griffith Law Review 20 (3), https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2011.10854714
  2. Simon, Hemopereki (2017) Te Arewhana Kei Roto i Te Rūma: An Indigenous Neo-Disputatio on Settler Society, Nullifying Te Tiriti, ‘Natural Resources’ and Our Collective Future in Aotearoa New Zealand Te Kaharoa 9 (1), https://www.tekaharoa.com/index.php/tekaharoa/article/view/6/4

Canada

[edit]

I could, of course, be reading things wrong (this has been known to happen), but the opening paragraph seems to suggest (to me at least) that this is a specifically Canadian topic, although the body of the article addresses peoples from around the world. PurpleChez (talk) 19:46, 9 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

No, you're right (as usual, apparently :-)), PurpleChez. It did read oddly. The whole article could do with a bit of an upgrade, but I did a bit of minor copyediting on the lead to remove the specific reference to Canada. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 02:20, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
As usual? I wish!! Thanks for the message!!!PurpleChez (talk) 22:45, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Reply