Talk:Impact Press

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 June 2009. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 August 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://www.punknews.org/article/19123/breakups-impact-press-1996-2006

NPOV

Latest comment: 19 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This seems to me to be a good example of a non-Neutral Point of View:

“

Most of the articles were political and supported the left and far left.

”

--Ohms law 14:56, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

In response to the suggestion of a 'non-neutral point of view,' as the publisher of this magazine, I would have to say that 'left' and 'far left' are accurate. There were also elements of socialism, communism and anarchy embraced by the magazine. Feel free to email me with any questions by visiting the magazine's web site (impactpress.com) 66.187.195.226 18:34, 7 February 2007 (UTC) Craig MazerReply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

NPOV