Talk:Immigration to Pakistan/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jhbuk (talk) 14:52, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   A few typos I'm correcting. Lead might need some rewriting?

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   No references in "Demographics", but otherwise very good

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   The article essentially describes current immigration patterns, but gives little information about background: Why are there only two short sentences about immigration before 2001? The article completely neglects historical immigration; No information about public opinion; Not much information about the effects the immigration has had

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Reasonable

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Only one image; if you can get any more it would help. No alt text, but that is not required for GA

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Fail for now: Not convinced about completeness