Talk:Imagined speech

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the physiology of the brain, nerves and nervous system.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The conclusion of the scientific trials is wrong. Identifying imagined speech isn't at 98.6% success. I fixed it to reflect the actual success rate. It was not vandalism. Read the papers cited. The conclusions on this wikipage do not match the conclusions in the paper. Jesus fuck, the wrong conclusion on this page actually wasted 5 hours of my time reading through that paper only to find out that identifying the syllables was really just over chance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.110.120.53 (talk) 18:46, 12 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Untitled