Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Identity element

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Paul August in topic Bad English

Exponentiation of real numbers

[edit]

There is no such operation unless a specific clause is made (e.g. to restrict to non-negatives bases, or to use a branch of the complex-valued analytic function for values). Please, do not break good, correct examples in the table. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:24, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Identity element/CommentsTalk:Identity element/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Sectioning, more content/prose, table clean up - grubber 15:16, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 15:16, 27 April 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 02:14, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Bad English

[edit]

I can not understand this statement: "This should not be confused with a unit; any element with a multiplicative inverse." Maybe the part after ';' should be deleted. Doru001 (talk) 16:24, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

A unit is any element with a multiplicative inverse. I've reworded the sentence. It now reads:
"This should not be confused with a unit, i.e. any element with a multiplicative inverse. Unity itself is necessarily a unit."
Is that better? Paul August 17:13, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply