Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:IWork.com

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by G&CP in topic Merge

Query

[edit]

Does iWork.com really apply as a "Mac OS and/or Mac OS X software-related article" in the stub classification? As a service I don't really think it counts as software... Photographerguy (talk) 02:31, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

No, not really software, but it is the closest mac stub that I could find. Shouldn't really be a big deal either way. ~ PaulT+/C 08:38, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Merge

[edit]

This should be merged with iWork. Yes, no? Nja247 (talkcontribs) 07:57, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

:See centralized discussion at Talk:iWork#Merge Ended as there was no agreement  ~ PaulT+/C 08:38, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I propose a merge again, as the iWork.com website has been shut down. As nothing much happened there, and it's now closed, it should be lowered in importance from full article to a historical note on the main iWork page. --Akhenaten0 (talk) 14:36, 8 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

"I agree" as per above VirusKA (talk) 23:38, 21 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
Will be merged, the merger has been proposed for years and I agree myself too. The lack of answers also show how quiet this article is. It's quite a waste of space when it can be merged into iWork, since it's part of that anyway. I'll perform the merge soon.--G&CP (talk) 18:29, 13 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Screenshots

[edit]

Does anyone have screenshots to add to this article?VisvambaNathan (talk) 15:17, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I still believe this topic does not need it's own article as of now. However I've done some for you per request File:Pages09.png and File:IWorkdotcom.png should do the trick. Nja247 (talkcontribs) 16:15, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply