Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Hyperrectangle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by 209.6.14.114 in topic Shouldn't the article say what "n" stands for?

Completness

[edit]

I think there should be some notices about the properties of a Hyperrectangle, e.g. Volume. 12:34, June 3 2012

References

[edit]

I added the references template. I think this is a useful concept, but never heard of any use of it. Tom Ruen 20:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Move to Orthotope?

[edit]

I found a Mathworld reference to an apparently identical definition:

  • Weisstein, Eric W. "Orthotope". MathWorld.
    Coxeter, H. S. M. Regular Polytopes, 3rd ed. New York: Dover, pp. 122-123, 1973.

I'll move this article to Orthotope, if there's no objections. Tom Ruen 16:12, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I added orthotope term, and references, and relink orthotope here. Tom Ruen 18:56, 1 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

I just removed three links from the article that I found to be redundant. I wanted to explain what I did here, because the edit summary box seemed too small.

  • I removed a link to rectangular. This is a redirect to rectangle, which is linked previously in the section.
  • I removed a link to prism because it was near a link to cuboid that I felt was more illustrative of the subject. Upon reflection, this might have been overkill. If someone wants to add it back, though, they should link to prism (geometry).
  • I removed a link to Cartesian product. There was an identical link earlier in the section.

--Wayne Miller 15:00, 7 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

likely?

[edit]
A four-dimensional orthotope is likely a hypercuboid.

What does that even mean? Can it be quantified? —Tamfang (talk) 23:35, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Shouldn't the article say what "n" stands for?

[edit]

I'm decades past high school. I didn't know what 'n' was so I had to do a bit of math in my head to figure it out by guess and check. Is this such a commonly known thing that it doesn't need to be listed in any of these articles? What if it's somebody's very first geometry article? Shouldn't it say " 'n' = the number of dimensions?" 209.6.14.114 (talk) 21:22, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply