Talk:Hydraulic conductivity

Untitled

Article doesn't dicuss the hydrolic engineering aspect of the subject

Why does "Transmissivity" re-direct here?

Dimensions?

No info on dimensions and commonly used units, could be useful, non? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.195.112.2 (talk) 14:23, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

I agree. In particular engineers tend to reduce head in feet with volume in cubic feet, even though head is really a measure of pressure. I would suggest going to SI for the units.

This becomes volume (m^3) * length (M) / ( Area (m^2) * pressure (Newtons/m^2) * time (sec) ) = M^4/(N*sec)

Danwoodard (talk) 21:54, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Empirical estimation

The Shepherd (1989) reference should be supplemented with a reference to Hazen equations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 52.129.8.47 (talk) 21:31, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. The Hazen (1892, 1911) equation is $K=a(D_{10})^{2}$. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.181.202.26 (talk) 21:43, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

The note at the bottom of this section about $d_{10}$ and $d_{50}$ seems self-contradictory to someone learning about hydraulic conductivity. Is there a difference between $D_{10}$ and $d_{10}$? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeff39 (talk • contribs) 17:22, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Upper/lower case "d" for diameter does not matter. I'm not sure if one is more common than the other, but I'll change them to the uppercase "D".+mt 16:16, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Dynamic Viscosity

There is a typo with regard to the units, it reads "kg m^-1 s^-1" and it should be "kg m^-1s" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.5.12.125 (talk)

No, not a typo. The former is correct. Check your source again. +mt 03:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Experimental approach

Constant-head method

It appears you either skipped a step or assumed the reader would know the nomenclature.

Specifically, from the following two lines:

$Q=Avt\,$

Using Darcy's Law, $v=Ki\,$,

you jump to this:

yields $Q={\frac {AKht}{L}}$

While it's implicitly obvious (to a reader who can perform algebra), you don't explicitly state that $i={\frac {h}{L}}$.

You also didn't define $i\,$ (hydraulic gradient?) or state that it's dimensionless.

Please consider revising for clarity--QLFixBoy (talk) 16:50, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Accommodated the comments of QLFixBoy and added sections "Resistance" and "Anisotropy". R.J.Oosterbaan (talk) 23:27, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

I may be wrong, but doesn't "Q" stand for flow (ex ft3/second) not quantity (ft3)? If so, time should not be included in the formula. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 13:16, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

In literature the symbol Q is generally used for quantity of flow per unit of time (discharge) indeed, but here it is clearly defined as a volume. One could consider to change the symbol Q in this article into V. - R.J.Oosterbaan (talk) 08:16, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Table of saturated hydraulic conductivity values

There appears to be an error in this table. The conversion factor between cm/sec and ft/day is about 3,000. The values here suggest a factor of 1,000.

I think that the table may have been mis-labeled; and that ft/day should actually be m/day.Davy p (talk) 10:27, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

The table is intended to show relative orders of magnitude, not absolute magnitudes. The actual conversion from cm/sec → ft/day is 2.8346457×10³, and from cm/sec → m/day is 0.864×10³. These both round up/down to 10³, but you are correct that m/day is closer by a small margin. I think the intent is to show both SI and imperial units. +mt 23:26, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Hydraulic conductivity

Changed line Q = Av to Q/t = Av. I'm pretty sure flow velocity is flow rate / area as opposed to flow / area. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VikiSturmann (talk • contribs) 11:42, 23 July 2012 (UTC)