Talk:Hurricane Nolo
Add topic| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Ts should be cat 5
[edit]| WP:NOTAFORUM |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
Nolo from 9/27 at 6:00 pm cst to 9/28 at 4:00 am cst had an immaculately circular eye with powerful visible eyewall vortices and perfect, textbook annular structure. I hate the nws and nhc now compared to the 1990s and 2000s. Now they js lowball everything, including tornadoes, but back then, they’d actually have reasonable estimates ~2026-52197-61 (talk) 21:27, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
|
Reason for merging
[edit]This article doesn't have a lot of content, and Nolo's impacts in Hawaii seem less then expected (the article was also published prematurely.) HawaiiStand (talk) 15:22, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
- @HawaiiStand
Done FaviFake (talk) 16:35, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
- Done as it ever be. Wow! ~2026-52443-23 (talk) 15:08, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
- Disagree per JayTee. Furthermore, the NHC forecasts this to enter the western pacific, so we should wait if that comes into fruition or not. Because if it does cross the IDL and enter the western pacific, a standalone article would be more independent from the main article due to the meteorological history spanning 2 basins. (I do not know how to word my argument, this is the best I got.) AverageAnonymousAndy (talk) 11:14, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with @JayTee32 on this one. This article has been created recently and has a potential for significant expansion ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 14:19, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
- Though If it won't get expanded and will stay like this in the future merging could be justified ⚡ StormL00ver ⚡ 14:25, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
Oppose on the grounds this article could be expanded significantly, just requires some editors to add more information. JayTee⛈️ 15:56, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

