Talk:Humin

Criticism

I propose a new section, Criticism... based on Lehmann, J.; Kleber, M. (2015-12-03), "The contentious nature of soil organic matter", Nature, 528, doi:10.1038/nature16069. Please see discussion at Talk:Humus. -- Paleorthid (talk) 00:06, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Literature on humin

Approximately 2500 reports have appeared about humin, according to Chemical Abstracts. This flood of literature is the basis of the guideline WP:SECONDARY. Here are the well cited review:

• Hayes, M. H. B.; Clapp, C. E., Humic substances: considerations of compositions, aspects of structure, and environmental influences. Soil Sci. 2001, 166, 723-737. doi 10.1097/00010694-200111000-00002
• Rice, J. A., Humin. Soil Sci. 2001, 166, 848-857. doi 10.1097/00010694-200111000-00009
• Filiciotto, L.; Balu, A. M.; Van der Waal, J. C.; Luque, R., Catalytic insights into the production of biomass-derived side products methyl levulinate, furfural and humins. Catal. Today 2018, 302, 2-15. doi 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.03.008
• Lipczynska-Kochany, E., Humic substances, their microbial interactions and effects on biological transformations of organic pollutants in water and soil: A review. Chemosphere 2018, 202, 420-437. doi 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.104

--Smokefoot (talk) 11:49, 11 April 2019 (UTC)