Talk:Human microphone

Neologism?

Could this be considered a Neologism? -- œ^™ 19:52, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

I don't think the article is promoting the term, if that's what you're asking. -anon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.65.30.236 (talk) 21:56, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

It *is* indeed a Neologism, but like many things at Wikipedia, acceptableness depends on the internal political connections of the article owner. In other words, forget about it, it's not worth the trouble. =//= Johnny Squeaky 03:19, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

"Pneumatic amplification"?

Is there really such a thing for the human voice?--NapoliRoma (talk) 07:13, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Fixed that.--NapoliRoma (talk) 17:59, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

"Pneumatic amplification" utilizes the opposite end of the system of normal "voice amplification", and is mostly used by politicians and corporate CEOs. =//= Johnny Squeaky 03:23, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

List of politicians who have been mic-checked

If anyone wants to compile such a list, there are 11 of them (with youtube links for each) at http://www.metafilter.com/109706/MIC-CHECK 89.31.117.58 (talk) 01:33, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Related software

I think this would be appropriate here, I would like to see added (and may if I get time):

• http://peoplesskype.org/
• http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2011/12/inhuman-microphone/

there must be others coming out of all the hackathons happening... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.75.132.51 (talk) 17:32, 15 December 2011 (UTC)