Talk:Huesca
Add topicLatest comment: 14 years ago by Number774 in topic Untitled
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Huesca article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]I've blocked out a section of text under Climate. It has two bits that give different text descriptions, but both have the Koppen climate classification Csa - which can't be correct. Unfortunately I don't know what is correct, and the author of the section has an IP address not a name, so can't be sent a message about it. Number774 (talk) 19:12, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- Why do you say that Csa can't be correct? Jotamar (talk) 15:49, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
- I don't say it can't be correct. I have no idea what Csa means - I'm not a climatologist. But it can't mean both "Mediterranean climate" and "Continental Mediterranean Climates" - even though I could believe either. Number774 (talk) 20:53, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter any more, I changed the wording back in November (here).
- I don't say it can't be correct. I have no idea what Csa means - I'm not a climatologist. But it can't mean both "Mediterranean climate" and "Continental Mediterranean Climates" - even though I could believe either. Number774 (talk) 20:53, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Huesca has dry summer months, so it´s better to forget about the Cfa (humid subtropical) parody, that´s haunting many Spanish cities in wikipedia. Csa is therefore correct!