Talk:hqx (algorithm)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computer graphics

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The external link for HQnX are suspended. Link are dead, for now.... --KymyA (talk) 07:29, 4 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

This is a beautiful algorithm: the combination of precalculated optimisation and fast lookup on render is very elegant, and the results are stunning. -- Gigacephalus (talk) 17:07, 29 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

I replaced the reference to https://code.google.com/archive/p/hqx as I moved this project to github. Also note this was not the original project, it was a port of Maxim Stepin code to use DevIL for image loading/saving and to more modern C. I did this cause his site was dead and it was hard to get copies of his code. It is such a great algorithm I had to preserve it. Besides switching to DevIL and adding a command line interface it pretty much as it was originally. Grom358 (talk) 19:27, 26 October 2018 (UTC) 'Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Untitled