Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Sxologist, in this edit you rearranged existing text in the article by adding a "Criticism" section. I reverted your edit. I'd like to explain why. Your edit not only did not improve the article, but was, in my judgment, illogical and confusing. It was illogical, because the "Reception" section includes a section titled "Overview", which is meant to summarize the book's overall reception. A book's overall reception includes the criticism it receives. If you try to add a separate section for criticism, and shift all the criticism there, the "Overview" section looses its rationale and cannot do its job properly. In addition to being illogical, your change was confusing because not all of the material you placed in the "Criticism" section was in fact concerned with criticism of the book. Please consider your edits more carefully. Freeknowledgecreator (talk) 00:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
