Talk:Himark BioGas

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Notability

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I have placed this tag on the main article because, as it reads currently, it is a straight-up advertisement.

A quick Google search turns up two potential sources independent of the company's own press releases: the Edmonton Journal article already cited, and a write-up in Nation News of Barbados. Whether either of these sources would pass WP:AUD is questionable. —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 21:55, 26 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Update

David Dodge's blog might pass WP:RSN, but it serves to expose what is the article's now-biggest problem: it's all PR. This article can be improved, I believe, but it has to use a writing style other than that of a press release. Also, even its sources—for example, Yahoo Finance—are reprints of press releases. Such write-ups cannot be used to establish notability. —ATinySliver/^ATalkPage 05:05, 31 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Notability

Update