Talk:High king
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Isaiah Henry.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Requested move 23 December 2018
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 23:24, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
High king → High King – Title. Per WP:CONSISTENCY with King of Kings, etc. Chicbyaccident (talk) 23:24, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - If anything, it is King of Kings that needs moving per MOS:JOBTITLES. Primergrey (talk) 15:13, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support per nom. This isn't a job title, it's a style of address. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:57, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- The same as "king", "queen", "lord", "madam", etc. Unless part of a specific title, all these forms of address are lower-case. Primergrey (talk) 21:55, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support per the argument of Randy Kryn. Dimadick (talk) 13:18, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose – I don't understand the support argument. Since when do we cap "a style of address"? Dicklyon (talk) 04:56, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose. The current title is the correct one. It's the other article that should be moved. Rreagan007 (talk) 05:06, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Addition to list of historical high kings / see also
[edit]Should a link to Bretwalda be added to the "See also" section / should it be included in the list of historical high kings? It seems to refer to the same concept. 213.184.113.113 (talk) 12:58, 24 July 2025 (UTC)