Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
Latest comment: 2 days ago8 comments3 people in discussion
@Artem.G and Renerpho: Is the infobox portrait actually depicting Goldschmidt? I'm suspicious of the lack of info given in that portrait's file description. The man in the portrait looks rather different than the Goldschmidt head depicted in the middle medal of File:Medal Luther Goldschmidt Hind.jpg. I tried looking for the portrait's source online and found this auction website that suggests that the portrait was made by Goldschmidt himself, but doesn't specify whether it is a depiction of himself or some random male. Nrco0e(talk • contribs)03:32, 8 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Nrco0e: There is a signature in the lower left, indicating that this was painted by someone named Goldschmidt, and a year that could read 1841. The signature looks not unlike that on other works attributed to Hermann Goldschmidt, like . According to , the painting was offered at an auction in July 2014 as a work of Hermann Goldschmidt, under the title Retrato masculino (male portrait). That title, which I believe is in Portuguese or Spanish, is probably not original. It could be due to the seller, or more likely the auction house (Sala de Ventas, Barcelona). According to , it was sold twice, first in May 2014, then again a few months later. I see no reason to doubt that Hermann Goldschmidt is the artist, but there is no indication that this is a self portrait. That's certainly not what was claimed at the auction (although the description online may have been misinterpreted, see below). I agree that it looks nothing like the face depicted on the medal. Unfortunately, whatever likeness of Goldschmidt was used to create that medal doesn't seem to be easily available online.
I don't know much about art, but the man in the painting looks like someone from the mid-to-late 1700s to me (high-collared coat, rolled wig, etc.). I think it's anachronistic for the mid 1800s, and I'm not convinced that Goldschmidt painted it from life. It may be a copy of an older portrait by someone else; or it could be someone who asked to be painted in an old-fashioned dress. Either way, there doesn't seem to be any information about the sitter. For anything else (and probably more), you should ask an art expert.
Here is what that auction page looked like in May 2019, a month before this was uploaded to Commons, with a description that is even shorter than what it is now. In particular, it didn't specify at the time that Hermann Goldschmidt was the artist, which was added to the 2014 auction page at an unknown time between 2019 and now. (Why would they edit the description of a painting that was sold 5+ years earlier?) I could see myself misinterpreting that older version, thinking that Goldschmidt was the subject of the painting. I suspect that רונאלדיניו המלך misinterpreted that description when they uploaded the file to Commons. I am tagging them here, hoping that they know more about it. Renerpho (talk) 07:39, 8 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Nrco0e: I agree, it's probably best to remove it from the article. Would you mind fixing the file description on Commons as well? Once the description on Commons has been clarified, I may drop a note on some of the other Wikipedias that use it. Renerpho (talk) 08:55, 8 August 2026 (UTC)Reply