Talk:HarfBuzz

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 November 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to Pango.

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Typography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

LWN source

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This is an excellent and comprehensive article on HarfBuzz that we should crib from heavily - David Gerard (talk) 12:33, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

@David Gerard: Way ahead of you, already did a little. :) -- intgr talk 12:46, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Recent expansion work

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Did a few passes on this article recently. The first edit brought it closer to B-class (added refs, structured the History and Architecture sections). Looking at it after that edit though, the History section still read like a changelog -- "version X added Y, version Z added W." Second pass condensed that into a thematic narrative. This latest round adds the shaping-vs-layout distinction to the lead (which the "So what is harfbuzz?" thread above had been asking for since 2013), plus the adoption timeline and text-runs concept in Architecture. Sources are the Byfield LWN piece and Esfahbod's 2016 "10 Years of HarfBuzz" slides. Sparks19923 (talk) 04:16, 11 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

LWN source

Recent expansion work