Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Hardware backdoor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 hours ago by JaredMcKenzie in topic Bloomberg spy chip story?

Suggestions of new sections

[edit]

New sections for the article: (Motivations), (Types of hardware backdoors), (Target devices of hardware backdoors), (Detection methods), (Prevention methods). Faltur (talk) 12:15, 28 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Bad Examples

[edit]

I've noticed two examples in the Examples section that should not appear on this page:

1. 2012: Chinese device manufacturer found to carry a backdoor

This is not a hardware backdoor; rather it is a software backdoor that was baked into software that was installed on a limited set of hardware.

2. October 2018: Bloomberg reported an Attack by Chinese spies that infiltrated 30 US companies

This has been proven to be false and should be removed.[1]

Madogstony101 (talk) 03:17, 22 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. Wemple, Erik. "Your move, Bloomberg". The Washington Post. Washington Post. Retrieved 22 February 2019.

Bloomberg spy chip story?

[edit]

The article claimed "an attack by Chinese spies that infiltrated 30 US companies" via Bloomberg. I found it surprising that a widely discredited story is now being pushed as a fact in wikivoice on this article. Typically discredited claims shouldn't have any weight here and should be removed or at minimum, it should have context where many experts checked and stated it was either based on a misunderstanding or it is not only wrong but has so many mistakes that are too frequent to count.

However I am also aware Bloomberg didn't retract but doubled down and claimed without evidence that they can't give their sources due to shadowy world of espionage. Blah blah regardless - such extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence per WP:EXTRAORDINARY and backings in which this claim does not have. If anything, it's the opposite where it's been disputed heavily. I didn't remove the claim but I did add context it was never proven with evidence and is widely disputed by US/UK intelligence and some major companies. JaredMcKenzie (talk) 00:38, 24 September 2026 (UTC)Reply