Talk:HandClap
Add topicLatest comment: 8 years ago by Pepperbeast in topic Requested move 4 November 2017
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
![WikiProject icon](/restyle/wiki/File:WikiProject_Songs_7"_record_on_sheet_music.png){kind=small}
Requested move 4 November 2017
[edit]
 | It was proposed in this section that HandClap be renamed and moved to Handclap (song).
The discussion has been closed, and the result will be found in the closer's comment. Links: current log • target log |
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. PepperBeast (talk) 19:12, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
(non-admin closure) HandClap → Handclap (song) – If you really think about it, "HandClap" is the way the song is stylized. Literally the word "handclap" does exist, therefore it should be titled as suck. JE98 (talk) 02:04, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- I don't have strong feelings about it one way or another, but most sources I have seen use "HandClap". Sometimes examples of camel case stay, like on This Summer's Gonna Hurt like a MotherFucker (which I never cared for the stylisation of either, just noting it). I would say what matters most is how it's referred to by the majority of sources. Ss112 02:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Support just a stylism. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:04, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Whether its a stylism but or an intentional capitalization, it should be preserved in the article name. WP looks silly when we our article names don't match other search results, and it confuses readers. Current name doesn't conflict with anything else and per WP:SMALLDIFFS it qualifies to stay. -- Netoholic @ 11:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose. All capitalisation is stylism. This is slightly unconventional, but nonetheless, it's intentional. We shouldn't try to "correct" the title of someone's work. PepperBeast (talk) 02:18, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- Closing. No good reason to change this. Calling the spelling of this somg a "styleism" amounts to no more than WP:IDON'TLIKEIT.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.