Talk:Hamad City incursion
Add topic | You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}
You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning {
display: none;
}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
| Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the Arab–Israeli conflict.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 April 2024
[edit] | This edit request to Battle of Hamad has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add the word "The" at the very beginning of the article to make it grammatically correct Game2Winter (talk) 23:35, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Is isw a rs for this?
[edit]Is the institute for the study of war a reliable source for this? I know it was a reliable source in the Russian invasion of Ukraine but I haven't seen too many third parties rely on it for these really invasion of gaza. @The Great Mule of Eupatoria any insights? VR (Please ping on reply) 19:16, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- ISW does seem to be reliable, even though slightly biased in favour of Israel. I have cited it quite a few times before and it does cover daily progress and confrontations quite comprehensively when it comes to Gaza The Great Mule of Eupatoria (talk) 06:59, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- @The Great Mule of Eupatoria where is the information coming from? Is it all coming from IDF? Any WP:independent sources? VR (Please ping on reply) 17:12, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Though ISW leans a bit more pro-Israel, it cites a mixture of both IDF and militant publications The Great Mule of Eupatoria (talk) 17:21, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- @The Great Mule of Eupatoria where is the information coming from? Is it all coming from IDF? Any WP:independent sources? VR (Please ping on reply) 17:12, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Edit request 11 June 2025
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Removed unsourced claim please. This is not repeated in any of the cited sources:
Diff:
| − | + |
Lavipao (talk) 21:10, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Done Hi Lavipao, I actually removed two sentences, because the sentence before the one you wanted to be removed could also not be confirmed by the source. Lova Falk (talk) 08:02, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! Lavipao (talk) 20:39, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- Start-Class Middle Eastern military history articles
- Middle Eastern military history task force articles
- Start-Class Post-Cold War articles
- Post-Cold War task force articles
- Start-Class Israel-related articles
- Unknown-importance Israel-related articles
- WikiProject Israel articles
- Start-Class Palestine-related articles
- Unknown-importance Palestine-related articles
- WikiProject Palestine articles