Talk:Group Exemption Letter
Add topic | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled
[edit]This article seems to be well-researched, but it needs to be wikified (the terms/ definitons within it need to be linked to internal pages) because all of the information is essentially useless to users who aren't familiar with all the lingo if that lingo isn't readily accessible (i.e. wikified)--Hraefen 09:58, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Group Exemption Letter/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| ==WP Tax Class==
Start class because more than one section but needs other sections devoted to context, history, impact, etc. Also, it needs to be further wikified and referenced.EECavazos 19:36, 3 November 2007 (UTC) ==WP Tax Priority== Low priority because the article doesn't put out how important this is, and so what may be inferred is that this article would get low traffic. Further, it is isolated to one country.EECavazos 19:37, 3 November 2007 (UTC) |
Last edited at 19:37, 3 November 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 16:46, 29 April 2016 (UTC)