Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria
Grisedale is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The paragraph starting "Walking is popular" is rather odd. It is clearly untrue both from current and historic OS mapping that "Prior to the open access laws introduced from 2000 onwards, the dale did not possess any rights of way", whatever Ref. 36 may or may not state. The 2000 open access legislation is independent of rights of way. "However, the track used to go between the ranges to Uldale", implies that the track no longer does, but this track still exists as a byway and then a footpath. So there clearly is at least one right of way! Phodgkin (talk) 20:24, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
