Talk:Grey noise

Plagarism?

It appears the text of this article is taken verbatim from http://www.ptpart.co.uk/show.php?contentid=71 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.245.8.28 (talk) 17:14, 9 February 2007 (UTC).

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 09:53, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Another criterion

I seem to remember a political criterion by which white noise is an utterance which makes sense, though it might be insincere, and you know where it's 'coming from.' Gray/Grey noise is meaningful but unattributed; black noise is meaningless. Example: If a dictator issues a glowing statement about his country's progress in the government-controlled papers, that's white noise: white because it makes sense and you know who said it; noise because it isn't true. If you tune in on a 'pirate radio' broadcast, it's gray noise--the words make sense, but you don't know whether it's true or not because you can't tell who is responsible for it. Black noise, I guess, is just meaningless static, perhaps meant to jam broadcasts of the other two types. Does anybody have any references for anything like that??

Terry J. Carter (talk) 04:37, 10 March 2012 (UTC)