Talk:Greg Mail
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 19 years ago by Damanmundine1 in topic Untitled
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]This is gushing praise for a batsman who has been an average performer at first class level. Follow the link to the Cricinfo blurb and read for yourself. His stats (61 matches, avge 32) don't match the glowing description, which sounds like it was written by his manager. Now that I've taken out the POV stuff, is there any reason for an article on Mail to exist? It's not like he's been considered for Australian selection or anything, and he hasn't been in the spotlight for anything else. Damanmundine1 11:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (sports and games) articles
- Low-importance biography (sports and games) articles
- Sports and games work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class cricket articles
- Low-importance cricket articles
- Stub-Class cricket articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class EAP cricket articles
- EAP cricket task force articles
- WikiProject Cricket articles
- Stub-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- WikiProject Australia articles



