Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism
Graduated electronic decelerator is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
@Rofa33: Coming here per BRD. I'm confused as to why you reverted my removal of the hatnote. In what way is there a reasonable possibility of a reader arriving at the article either by mistake or with another topic in mind (WP:HATNOTERULES)? ~ F4U (talk • they/it) 10:42, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
A reader looking for ECT and not knowing or remembering what it is called may end up at this article instead. There is a significant possibility for confusion between the two especially considering they are both described in regular speech as "shock therapy". I am still new to Wikipedia editing as a whole and so if it is deemed that my revert was in error I apologise. Rofa33 (talk) 11:19, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It appears the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's attempted and proposed bans of the GED are mentioned in detail in the lead and in three different sections of the article body. This is neither efficient nor necessary. I'm leaving the sections in question intact for now (after updating them), but suggest someone cut two of the three mentions that follow the lead. For inexperienced editors, I also suggest reading through an article before you edit it to see if someone already added the information that you're adding; if they did, you don't need to add it again in the vast majority of cases. DoItFastDoItUrgent (talk) 20:27, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
