Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Goon squad

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"commonly associated with either pro-union violence or anti-union violence"?

[edit]

This seems to me a dubious claim. While no doubt groups have been labelled "goon squads" in the context of labour violence, the term undoubtedly has a much broader meaning. --Eldomtom2 (talk) 15:59, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

The thought expressed in your first sentence has no logical connection to the second. ♟♙ (talk) 23:28, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

The sentence traces back to the original edit, but it's not clear where the "pro-union violence" part comes from; most of the sources in the article are about anti-union violence (after all, unions do not have the power to hire people at companies; employers do). The alleged source (United States Senate Select Committee on Improper Activities in Labor and Management) is so voluminous that it should probably count as a primary source. The only other source, a 1938 article in The Nation, seems a bit dubious. Nemo 06:25, 6 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

And indeed it turns out the source didn't quite support the claim. Nemo 06:39, 6 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
unions do not have the power to hire people at companies; employers do: this is false premise. Unions absolutely have the resources to hire and/or organize goon squads and the have a long history of doing do as retaliation for strikebreakers. There's no explanation for why you think The Nation is a dubious source or why the exhaustive detail to limit Pro-Union Goon Squad activity it to one specific event is needed. - The literary leader of the age ✉ 15:41, 8 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
I didn't say unions don't have resources, only they have different kind of resources. After reading the 1938 article, I understood what kind of goon squad was meant there. I don't know whether that's a sufficient source for broader statements; the article itself seems to treat it as exceptional. Nemo 07:26, 9 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Sabotage of "pro democracy movement" doesn seem to fit the definition.

[edit]

Shouldn't it be trade union related? 5.151.21.128 (talk) 15:37, 20 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Not necessarily. God squads can be employed in many different situations, the labor union association is only the most common. EnPassant♟♙ (talk) 16:10, 21 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

The latest removal was reverted. I think the entire paragraph is WP:OR, because not a single one of the sources uses the term "goon squad" to describe the events. If a source is added that characterises it as a "goon squad", the mention could be kept, but it could still need some rewriting to avoid WP:SYN. Nemo 19:39, 6 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

After looking again I deleted that paragraph. The sources cited don't mention the term goon squad. I didn't include it when I started this article back in 2011, I guess someone else added it later. - The literary leader of the age ✉ 15:24, 8 March 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! Nemo 07:26, 9 March 2025 (UTC)Reply