Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music
Glam rock is within the scope of the Music genres task force of the Music project, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardize music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the task force guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good article status.Music/Music genres task forceWikipedia:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forceTemplate:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forcemusic genre
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rave, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.RaveWikipedia:WikiProject RaveTemplate:WikiProject RaveRave
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The second paragraph mentions Lou Reed and Alice Cooper as "the only American artists to score a hit in the UK". But Suzi Quaro went to number 1 in the UK with Can the Can. So it seems unfair to exclude her from this. She's mentioned in the next sentence but she unquestionably was an American artist to have a hit in the UK. 179.232.51.112 (talk) 11:26, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Similarly, Sparks' album Kimono My House reached the number 4 spot on the UK Albums Chart, with the single This Town Ain't Big Enough for Both of Us hitting number 2. on the UK Singles Chart. It feels highly misleading to suggest there were only two American Glam artists to find reach that level of acclaim in the UK. RegionalsAtMost (talk) 06:55, 14 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
I had exactly the same thought. It presently reads "In the United States, the scene was much less prevalent, with Alice Cooper and Lou Reed the only American artists to score a hit in the UK. Other American glam artists include New York Dolls, Sparks, Suzi Quatro, Iggy Pop and Jobriath." This doesn't make sense since Suzi Quatro had several big hits in the UK. I think I'll just go ahead and edit it ...
There isn't a sentence with the "Subgenre" term in this source of the Guardian. Per wp:undue weight "Generally, the views of tiny minorities should not be included at all". Per Undue weight, it is basically said it is wrong to give readers as 1st information in the lead... a minority view. Glam rock music experts and biographers, Paul Trynka + David Buckley (Bowie's), Mark Paytress (Bolan's), Simon Reynolds used the term "subgenre" for Glam rock. Per undue weight also advances that a minority view can be included in the body.
No huge changes in the lead without the consensus of many many users . User Aradicus77 has been pushing their own vision on every music genre article for weeks, having a new obsession for the "Subgenre" word and they have been sneaking that 'Subgenre' term in the lead of many music genres articles., basing on minorities views. Woovee (talk) 04:09, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
You can't ask someone to find quotes on google for you. If you want to include new facts, you do the job, you find sources. You select them. And you add it a sentence with a quote with "...." on wikipedia.
As a reader, I didn't see the word subgenre in the source of The Guardian about Marc Bolan selected by @Aradicus77:. You have to copy paste that sentence with the subgenre term off the Guardian source and include it in the body first.
The reader has to find the information easily. The reader has to see the subgenre term in the body with a quote and a source. Remember lead guideline. Facts have to be edited in the body first. Then per due / undue weight, facts in the body will be mentioned in the lead. Not the other way around. Woovee (talk) 18:34, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
@WooveeThe Guardian sources supports the "glitter rock" claim. That Gothic rock is a rock sub genre is not a contested fact except solely by you. It does not need an explicit citation. Verifiability does not mean that every single sentence in article needs a direct citation.--3family6 (Talk to me|See what I have done) 18:55, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
"Glitter rock" was not challenged here. Why do you digress?
Both you and @Aradicus77: claimed the subgenre term was present in the article.
Once again, either you admitted it was inaccurate you did a mistake or you prove the Subgenre term is in the Guardian source and include the quote in our article. Woovee (talk) 19:06, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Twisting words again, no one claimed that. 3family6 has just told you that claims which are not widely contested do not need an explicit citation. Verifiability does not mean that every single sentence in article needs a direct citation. See WP:WHENNOTCITE. Aradicus77 (talk) 19:08, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
That is inaccurate. I didn't revert the mention of Glitter rock as it was present in the lead.
The title of this section is titled "the subgenre term in the lead".
Again like for the post-punk article, you and Aradicus77 have to add quotes with sources in the body advancing glam rock is a "Subgenre". Woovee (talk) 20:13, 17 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Woovee my bad, that was a typo, I'm referring to this article. Have you read through the article? There's a book published by Routledge supporting the statement that it's a fashion and a subgenre. So that citation that you want is there.
Two is a minimum This is exactly the WP:OWN behavior that multiple editors have told you that you are exhibiting. You are arbitrarily dictating what standards must be accepted, rather than working with community consensus.
What's happening here is that you are so jaded by your interactions with Aradicus77 (and apparently others), that you aren't even reading the article content or accurately summarizing other editors' as well as your own edits.-3family6 (Talk to me|See what I have done) 15:31, 18 October 2025 (UTC)Reply