Talk:Girl Develop It

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 3 February 2017

Latest comment: 9 years ago6 comments5 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) SkyWarrior 20:22, 10 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Girl develop it → Girl Develop It – This is the correct capitalization for this organization's name, per its own website and normal practice. At the time I helped save the page from A7 deletion by supplying some decent coverage in reliable sources, I hadn't seen that Girl Develop It had existed before and had been salted. I think that by now, it may be a viable article, so I'm soliciting consideration of this by others. Largoplazo (talk) 12:10, 3 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Support per nomination and MOS:INSTITUTIONS. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 22:32, 3 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
You are correct, this needs to be changed, but I am unable to do so as a new wiki author and so I need to figure out how to request this. Jeffreydb (talk) 01:32, 4 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
- This discussion, with the tag at the top, is a step in the request. Eventually an admin will come by, make a decision based on this discussion, and, if agreeing with the move, will make it happen. Largoplazo (talk) 01:44, 4 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Support WP:CAPS In ictu oculi (talk) 13:16, 4 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Requested move 3 February 2017