Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Gerotor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Widefox in topic Epicyclic mechanisms

Epicyclic mechanisms

[edit]

What may be useful is inclusion of a link or two, where WP:SEEALSO says to include the description in such non-obviously related cases...

  • Epicyclic gearing – two gears mounted so that the center of one gear revolves around the center of the other

Both mechanisms have non-concentric rotating (planetary-type) gears/rotors with fixed ratios. Epicyclic (depending on frame of reference). (how similar depends on the locked mode of the epicyclic gearing)

There's a few similar like cycloidal drive, and epicycloid (epicyclic -> epicyclic gearing).

The limited-slip differential link removed by the IP editor was put in by another editor not me, and again it is a related mechanism (depending on implementation of course). Widefox; talk 13:16, 20 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

The See also list should include items that have either similar function (gear pump), or similar mechanism. There is some, albeit minimal, overlap with a cycloidal drive. Despite the "GErotor" name, there is no overlap with gears: the teeth do not move in and out of mesh. The shape of a gerotor involves an epicyclic curve, but epicyclic gears do not: they move in a way that involves an epicyclic path, the gerotor does not. As to limited-slip differential, I can't even begin to imagine what they were thinking. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:09, 20 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
(ec - not going to merge my fix above now you've replied) Yes, you're right. My WP:OR failed, the connection is just internal gear. Diffs may use planetary gears, but that's a stretch too far to link to as these aren't epicyclic. Linked former in body, done. Widefox; talk 14:46, 20 February 2015 (UTC)Reply