Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
Comment: Thank you for your revisions on the article's tone -- they are going in the right direction, though many parts still feel more like "storytelling" than concise and encyclopedic description. I have a bigger concern, though, about the sourcing: I noticed that the explanation of In October and So On, a response to 1993 events, cites a 1975 book as the source. The 1975 book can't possibly explain events from twenty years in its future! Unless you are citing an explanatory introduction that was added to a more modern edition of that book...? If so, the citation needs to say so. For now, I am declining the article due to problems with verification. Please double check the sourcing before you resubmit. Samchenko certainly qualifies for a Wikipedia article, so this can be accepted once it fits better with Wikipedia's standards -- please do resubmit it, and thanks for your efforts here! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 07:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)ReplyThanks for your comments. I've checked the sources throughout the article and found them to be reliable, as far as the format of citation. The part you mentioned was an odd way to write about Samchenko's publications in general, and the citation of that source was not related to "In October and So On." However, I decided to delete the entire sentence due to its strange and confusing structure, as well as its inadequate placement in the original article on Ruwiki. Additionally, the information from that abstract is cited in other parts of the article.On the other hand, I worked a bit more on the tone of the article and would be grateful if you could reconsider it. Thanks again.05:25, 20 July 2025 (UTC)Kseni-kam (talk) 05:25, 20 July 2025 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=icon}
Comment: Thank you for your revisions on the article's tone -- they are going in the right direction, though many parts still feel more like "storytelling" than concise and encyclopedic description. I have a bigger concern, though, about the sourcing: I noticed that the explanation of In October and So On, a response to 1993 events, cites a 1975 book as the source. The 1975 book can't possibly explain events from twenty years in its future! Unless you are citing an explanatory introduction that was added to a more modern edition of that book...? If so, the citation needs to say so. For now, I am declining the article due to problems with verification. Please double check the sourcing before you resubmit. Samchenko certainly qualifies for a Wikipedia article, so this can be accepted once it fits better with Wikipedia's standards -- please do resubmit it, and thanks for your efforts here! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 07:35, 17 June 2025 (UTC)Thanks for your comments. I've checked the sources throughout the article and found them to be reliable, as far as the format of citation. The part you mentioned was an odd way to write about Samchenko's publications in general, and the citation of that source was not related to "In October and So On." However, I decided to delete the entire sentence due to its strange and confusing structure, as well as its inadequate placement in the original article on Ruwiki. Additionally, the information from that abstract is cited in other parts of the article.On the other hand, I worked a bit more on the tone of the article and would be grateful if you could reconsider it. Thanks again.05:25, 20 July 2025 (UTC)Kseni-kam (talk) 05:25, 20 July 2025 (UTC)