Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Gentry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 9 months ago by Johnbod in topic 800 AD instead of 800 BC


Misleading - Part of a series on European ranks

[edit]

This is misleading or simply wrong. Landed gentry is a part of the series, but not gentry in general, in the same way Upper class, Bildungsbürgertum is not. Moving Part of a series on European... ranks in Western culture to Landed gentry. Doctoral historian (talk) 12:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Gentry is not a title (Royal and noble ranks), as Aristocracy -moved to landed gentry i.e. people of good social position, specifically the class of people next below the nobility in position and birth.Doctoral historian (talk) 17:04, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
It's hard to see what you are trying to say, but Landed gentry in Britain is not a "rank" in any meaningful sense. It does not mean "people of good social position, specifically the class of people next below the nobility in position and birth", it means people who owned a lot of agricultural land, and lived off the proceeds. Johnbod (talk) 23:31, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Esquire

[edit]

There's this sentence:

' Esquire (abbreviated Esq.) is a term derived from the French "écuyer" '

But the word "écuyer" is modern French, there correct word here would be "escuier" in Old French


"Escuier" became "Esquire" in Middle English, & became "Squire" in Modern English.

"Escuier" became "Escuyer" in Middle French, & became "Écuyer" in Modern French.


If no one has a problem with it I'll change it to "Escuier" in a few days.

Ikmxx (talk) 23:36, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Gentri

[edit]

I feel like there should not be confused with the group Gentri, who don't have a Wikipedia page. AAEexecutive (talk) 20:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

800 AD instead of 800 BC

[edit]

Where the article says "800 BC", that does not make sense. I think it should read "800 AD". Compare with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_and_state_in_medieval_Europe where "800 AD" appears on the page. Netpicker (talk) 02:16, 5 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Done - it was originally AD, but changed, probably by a vandal, by 2024! If anyone wants to track down the edit & see if other changes were made that would be nice. Johnbod (talk) 03:16, 5 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks.
The books.google.com page for the quotation reference doesn't include any bracketed text after "they ruled,". See https://books.google.com/books?id=suLI7RoaBEEC&pg=PA34#v=snippet&q=%22In%20the%20latter%20half%20of%20the%20period%20in%20which%20they%20ruled%22&f=false. There could be a good reason for the addition of the bracketed text. I don't know.
I used WikiBlame to look for deletion of "800 AD": https://wikipedia.ramselehof.de/wikiblame.php?user_lang=en&lang=en&project=wikipedia&tld=org&article=Gentry&needle=800+AD&skipversions=0&ignorefirst=0&limit=1000&offmon=10&offtag=4&offjahr=2025&searchmethod=int&order=desc&binary_search_inverse=on&user=. See difference at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gentry&diff=prev&oldid=1081488971. So, someone changed "800 AD" to "800 CE", which I don't have an opinion on at the moment. I found this discussion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/BCE-CE_Debate.
Then, I looked for deletion of "800 CE": https://wikipedia.ramselehof.de/wikiblame.php?user_lang=en&lang=en&project=wikipedia&tld=org&article=Gentry&needle=800+ce&skipversions=0&ignorefirst=0&limit=500&offmon=10&offtag=5&offjahr=2025&searchmethod=int&order=desc&binary_search_inverse=on&user= See difference at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gentry&diff=prev&oldid=1193713509. You can see the user making the change and the reason given on that page. Netpicker (talk) 11:48, 5 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks - it looks like a typo by the era-fiddler in fact. The reason he gives is not valid - see WP:ERA. BC/AD is correct here, as the established style. Johnbod (talk) 13:13, 5 October 2025 (UTC)Reply