Talk:Genreflecting

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Untitled

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I would like to call into question whether this word exists in any context but the Genreflecting book; I think it's actually an example semi-useful cleverness on the part of the author and an effective title for a book, but no more. The first couple pages of a Google search for "genreflect" (a related part of speech should work, right?) return information about the book and its online counterpart, plus lots of recommendations to search for "genuflect", a totally legitimate word. I propose that this article be reframed as an article about the book or deleted altogether. Bigelectric (talk) 07:05, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Untitled