Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Gapjil

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Sarsenet in topic Remove logo images

Requested move 5 January 2018

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:14, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


Gapjilpower harassment in South Korea – Reasonable arguments were presented in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabjil suggesting that this name would be more clear. Thoughts? Ping AfD participants: @Anthony Appleyard, Sro23, Tiens, and Aoinne: Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:04, 5 January 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:25, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

The word is used in English language sources. No need for a translation here. The English language has always accommodated new words from different cultures. Egaoblai (talk) 21:45, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Support the move. Merging to Power harassment#Korea seems like a good option too. --Phonet (talk) 19:28, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Sawol: What do you mean "primitive"? If what you mean is that gapji is visceral human behaviour that is unaffected by objective reasoning, I think that is applicable to all power harrassments. --Phonet (talk) 16:04, 13 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Remove logo images

[edit]

I think the incorporation of multiple logo images in the article is inappropriate and irrelevant. Is anyone opposed to their removal? Sarsenet (talk) 02:27, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply