Talk:Fuzhou Road
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fuzhou Road article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from Fuzhou Road appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 February 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 19:22, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
( )
_Road.jpg)
Fuzhou Road, 1927
- ... that Fuzhou Road (pictured) was once the centre of the Chinese publishing industry?
- ALT1: ... that one could go to work, browse books, grab a bite to eat, hire a prostitute, and smoke opium without leaving Fuzhou Road (pictured)? Source: 福州路文化街 [Fuzhou Road Cultural Street] (in Chinese). Huangpu District Government. Retrieved 18 January 2025.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link) - Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/LGBTQ synagogue
- ALT1: ... that one could go to work, browse books, grab a bite to eat, hire a prostitute, and smoke opium without leaving Fuzhou Road (pictured)? Source: 福州路文化街 [Fuzhou Road Cultural Street] (in Chinese). Huangpu District Government. Retrieved 18 January 2025.
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:42, 18 January 2025 (UTC).
This is a new article, which is well written, well referenced to reliable sources, and of an appropriate length. There are no copyvio issues (confirmed by reading the sources in English-language translation). The image is in the public domain, and works at a small size. The two hooks are interesting, and verified by the source(s). Both would work, but ALT0 has the advantage of being shorter. QPQ has been done. Nice work! Chaiten1 (talk) 13:23, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
