Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Function point

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Colinrhammond in topic merge with Software metrics

alternative methods

[edit]

Other alternative methods should be mentioned here or otherwise in Software metric

Alternatives: Lines of Code, Mark II, COSMIC FFP (now an ISO standard 19761), 3D, FP+

merge with Software metrics

[edit]

Function points are a little past their prime. They were bigger in the 80's and 90's but the frequency of mention in literature is almost vanished. I would make this one of the historica

I disagree with this opinion, Functional sizing in FP is the only engineering metric applicable to software size. The software industry has a poor reputation and needs to sharpen it's game. There is much to gain from the original methods (IFPUG - based) and even more to benefit from the modern version - COSMIC FSM. They have had a mixed reputation in the past, but like many metrics if misused can give misleading results. The industry is hanging on the uses of story points which is not even a metric at all. It is high time that the industry embraced suitable measurement and this can start here by allowing functional sizing to be properly represented in wikipedia.--Colinrhammond (talk) 16:41, 2 June 2019 (UTC)Reply