Talk:Freixial Formation
Add topic| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
source of my claims
[edit]the teeth referred to allosaurus,torvosaurus and ceratosaurus in this paper https://repositorio.ulisboa.pt/entities/publication/afff4694-36b6-4377-b751-890741079dde are in one of her paper, the paper is 318 pages in. They used robust methods to assign each tooth to their respective geniuses and bear in mind definitve remains of all three are found elsewhere in the lusitanian sequence, so this backs up the referrals.
dacentrurus and dracopelta are mentioned from the freixial formation on page 26 of this paper. https://palaeo-electronica.org/content/pdfs/662.pdf material referred to lusotitan,diplodocines and camarasaurs is on page 30 of this paper. there's also a chart at the bottom of the paper giving the #,locality,horizon and classification of the sauropod material
page 3 of the cambelodon paper provides the age range I provided.
- Start-Class Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Palaeontology articles
- Start-Class Palaeontology articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles
- Start-Class Geology articles
- Low-importance Geology articles
- Low-importance Start-Class Geology articles
- WikiProject Geology articles
- Start-Class Portugal articles
- Low-importance Portugal articles
- WikiProject Portugal articles