Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

Jump to content

Talk:Freezing level

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Wuerzele in topic incredibly poor article

freezing point of water

[edit]

I quote, from the Celsius article accessed 2011/02/06 12:42 GMT+0, "the actual melting point of ice is very slightly (less than a thousandth of a degree) below 0 °C". It seems well established that 0°C should be considered the melting point of ice, yet this article claims 0°C to be the freezing point of water. Although this description avoids confusion, given the title of the article as the "Freezing level", it is wrong. Surely this should be corrected with a small summary of the history of 0°C?

R.bares (talk) 12:47, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

I take that back, having seen the paper doi:10.1063/1.2183324 referenced in the article Melting Point. In 2006 the authors measured the melting point as 0.002519 +/- 0.000002 degrees C R.bares (talk) 13:14, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Why does the main article not include freezing point equivalence in degrees Fahrenheit? After all, over 300 million people in the US use this standard, plus tens of millions of others in other parts of the world. Merlin1935 (talk) 04:38, 14 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

incredibly poor article

[edit]
  • No references except "The Mountain Manual, Seuil, 200" (???) since article creation in 2006- any editor since has obviously added tehir own rant !
  • no definition in body- merely measurement of atmospheric temp
  • no historical changes mentioned- locational only
  • title is imprecise: freezing level height is the correct term- freezing level is abbreviated and can be confused with freezing point. Suggest renaming.

Wuerzele (talk) 08:51, 12 August 2025 (UTC)Reply